Re: Proposing revised rules..

**Kinriku** Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:37 am

Thiamor wrote:But in my opinion, if someone is crossing the line with racist comments against one person (2 'bickering') as you stated, you should let an admin know. Racism shouldn't be condoned just because you all are getting tired of having to help. This makes it seem like you wanna be lazy. If something happens, it's your all's job to keep the game in line. Not just hope they go to ignore. Mods help the Server cause it's all they can do. They should be left in charge of those simple rules. Those like Pixel Artists, Coders and Mappers should only get involved when they don't listen and continue. Such brings warnings, walls, mutes, kicks and jailing. Ignoring makes them go to someone else. Yeah, they could very well ignore them, but your job isn't to just sit around, making everyone go to ignore. You help, or you do the job given to you like being an artist.

This is one reason why people come to FE. Cause of the active Admins. People LEAVE EO MAIN cause the Admins there don't do (no swearing). Your best bet is to keep the rules we have now. They work more times than not.

But one of the moment common complaints from the players is that they get jailed // muted // kicked // banned for stating their opinions. If someone's stating their opinion under this rule, they won't be punished. It's a matter of maturity. There are better things for the admins to spend their time on than immature fights. :/

Thiamor Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:51 am

But a MOD, more specifically, is supposed to take care of things like that. Main reason as to why you hire mods.

**Kinriku** Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:52 am

Thiamor wrote:But a MOD, more specifically, is supposed to take care of things like that. Main reason as to why you hire mods.

Well, I was thinking of suggesting hiring LG's that exist strictly for the purpose of conflict management. :/

Thiamor Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:11 pm

That's what they do cause there is only but a limited amount of options as to what they can do, as it is.

Reaper Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:04 am

I propose a new forum rule.
NO SIGNATURES THIS BIG!!!!!
______________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________-
(Sry for the spam, but people but that crap in thier signatures and it is RIDICULOUS!!!!

**Artist** Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:06 am

Reaper wrote:I propose a new forum rule.
NO SIGNATURES THIS BIG!!!!!
______________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________-
(Sry for the spam, but people but that crap in thier signatures and it is RIDICULOUS!!!!

Like mine?

Reaper Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:12 pm

No, yours isn't too bad, some peoples take up half a page! :[ It's retarded.

Tokyo Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:34 am

ScottD wrote:
5. No autoing/speeding/manipulative programs or abusing glitches.

Note: Autoing is not limited to just running scripts. Autoing is a general term for using manipulative programs to gain levels. It doesn't matter if you are AFK or not, if you are not manually pressing your ctrl key, that is considered autoing.
Punishment: Player is warned on first offense, banned on second offense, and permanently banned on third offense. If player by-passes the permanent ban, they are wiped.

Does this apply to a player who happens to be AFK-ing at a safe spot, with his/her pet attacking the monsters?

ScottD wrote:
8. Players must pay if they lose an arena or tic-tac-toe bet.

Note: All arena and tic-tac-toe bets must be best 2 out of 3 matches.
Punishment: The player is asked first to give the item(s) they bet to the admin overseeing the match. If player does not hand over said item(s), they may be permanently banned. If player by-passes the permanent ban, they are wiped. The winner of the bet may have their lost item(s) given back to them.

Should there be an event of scamming/cheating, I reckon every bets to be supervised by an admin.

ScottD wrote:
11. No spawning in PK or arena.

Punishment: Player is warned on first offense, and walled on second offense. Player may be banned for up to 24 hours if spawning continues after second offense.

Does this apply to during an event held by an admin/player? Kindly revise. (;

ScottD wrote:
12. No KSing (kill stealing) players.

Note: If a player is attacking a monster, do not attack it. This rule applies mainly to training areas. This rule does not apply so much to boss monster areas. However, players are not allowed to join in on attacking boss monsters when the HP is at "red".
Punishment: Player is warned on first offense, and walled on second offense. Player may be banned for up to 24 hours if KSing continues after second offense.
This rule does NOT mean you cannot walk in to "someone elses training area" and train. It only applies to killing NPC's that they have started hitting.

Evidence should be provided before further action is being carried out. We would never know who had entered the training spot first. Furthermore, training places should be Free-For-All, due to the fact that F.E does not have much training places for the majority. Hence, I suggest this rule to be applied mainly on ks-ing bosses.

Overall, I support the idea and bumps for this 'rule-book'. (;

**cursedangel** Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:24 am

awsome i like it Very Happy

Sponsored content